Support clean technicia’s work through subscription or strip.
Some of you may be thinking that the US Supreme Court will be an important thing between the Constitution and the absolute dreams of the Trump administration. This is a pleasant thinking, but ignores the fact that six of the nine members of the court (do not deserve to take advantage of it) were raised by the same culture that gave us the project 2025.
Contradictory This week, a dozen judges, including the Democratic and Republican presidents – including Trump – were near the Federal Court. NBC News With their complaints. The move is seen as an unprecedented exhibition of frustration and anger.
The group told NBC NewsFor, for, for,.
“The lower court judges are presented with controversial cases related to the Trump administration. They work hard to reach their decisions. When they go against Trump, administration officials and allies have criticized the judges with strong terms of the Supreme Court.
Those emergency orders are part of the fact that the court is known as the “Shadow Doctor”. Emergency applications circulate among the judges, who vote yes or no, and issue decisions that are often signed and abandon the information about how every member of the court voted. This is the closest thing to the United States for the secret tribunals.
According to Wikipedia, the critics of the Shadow Duct argue that it gives the court irrational power. Harvard University law professor Nicholas Stephanoplas said, “Unknown, unauthorized judicial orders seem to be contrary to what the courts are considered … If the courts do not have to defend their decisions, they are not just a force of power.”
David Cole, the national legal director of the American Civil Liberties Union and Professor of Georgetown University Law Center, has also said that if the court can “make important decisions without giving any reasons, then there is no limit to what they can do.”
Steve Wildek of the University of Texas School of Law, wrote New York Times: “Until this term, it was not heard to describe a new constitutional principle by issuing an emergency order to enforce it … Many judges are fasting fasting tools to help control their documents not only to change their own standards in favor of their own standards, but also to use the basic principles of judicial decisions.
“For a court whose legal status is largely dependent on the public’s views about its integrity, for millions of Americans, life -threatening, unmarked, and developing unknown decisions can be just a bad thing.”
Two decisions were reversed today
Now today, the court used a shadow duct to abolish two lower court decisions. The first dismissed a decision of the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals, which upheld the decision of District Court Judge Mama E Frampong, which received the “mountain of evidence” in Los Angeles, which is violating the constitution of the implementation. The plaintiff, who said the administration’s approach was equivalent to “clear racial profiling”, joined US citizens immigration stops. An appeal court left the Frampong decision to its place.
The administration argued that the order to crack down on illegal immigration has been incorrectly restricted. Well, two. Is there any restriction on Trump’s private army activities? Not in accordance with 6 mega members of the court.
In another case, the last remaining Democratic member of the Federal Trade Commission included the firing of Rebecca Slaughter, while the case was in the courts. Heather Cox Richardson wrote in a blog post, since 1935, the country’s highest court had said that the president did not have the authority to dismiss the members of the independent agencies manufactured by the Congress.
“The court has decided these cases without hearing, briefing or written decision, called the” Shadow Doctor “. Richardson wrote, traditionally, such signed, unclear decisions are used to maintain the stagnation or to resolve the issue of any procedure, but they are used under Trump.
“The court, whose three judges were appointed by Trump, supported them in Shadow Duckett’s decisions. NBC News Note that this new process of eliminating lower court decisions is damaging the confidence in the judiciary. It supports the administration’s statement that the courts are trying to end Trump’s presidency.
Harvard Law School Professor Noah Fieldman wrote in a piece of opinion Bloomberg:
“This decision makes an amazing example of contemporary anti-immigrants’ prejudice, how much it deviates from ordinary constitutional rules related to the government that stops from ordinary citizens. It would be clear to the government that they have to stop all young black men in the palaces of high crime, or to prevent all the men in this case.
“Technically, the quality of a criminal stop is a potential cause, as Kiwan states that the ‘reasonable suspicion’ for immigration is higher than the standard. But the constitutional principle that anyone should apply with equal strength to the color of their skin (or in the way they speak or where they work).
No surprise.
No one should surprise anyone. Since the Lewis Powel Memorandum in 1971, the festival of the United States has been creating pace, in which it was argued that the interests of the corporations should gain prominence over individual independence. As a result of this argument, the Reagan era was destroyed by the “trial down economics” and became a map of the project 2025, a fascist master plan, which is now the US government’s official policy.
Do not monitor Charles Coach’s efforts for a minute, which has been the architect of ultra -conservative movement for 60 years. Its Heritage Foundation formed the Project 2025 and its Federal Society has given importance to many right -wing lawyers. All six existing members of the Conservative Wing of the USSC were breastfeeding on the breast of the Federal Society.
A component of conservative thought is called “unit executive theory”. According to Wikipedia, “In the US Constitutional Act, the universe executive theory is a theory that states that the President of the United States has the only authority over the Executive Branch. This theory is often exposed to the ability of the president to remove the ability to remove the ability to remove employees within the executive branch; The reasons are controversial, while the Reagan administration has accepted a strong unit executive.
This theory is largely based on the Westing clause, which develops the president with ‘executive power’ and places the office above the executive branch. Critics discuss how much power and discretion of the Westing provides the president, and emphasizes other anti -constitutional measures that provide checks and balances on executive power. In the 2020s, the Supreme Court said, about the powers given by the Westing clause, ‘the entire executive power is only for the president’.
Historical
Fascism is nothing new. Richardson indicated in his recent post,
“The Trump administration’s clear plan reflects the Nazi political theorerest Carl Schmidt’s strategy, whose writings have recently fascinated prisoners at the US right, including billionaire Peter Theel and the person who influenced it, including Kurt Yaron, who has opposed his liberal democracy.
“Instead, they argued that real democracy eliminates individual self -determination by making people one with the state one and by using their will by state power. Uniformity needs to be rescued from opposition.
Richardson added, “Most of Summit’s philosophy has focused around the idea that the power of a nation that is based in a constitution and the rule of law is from a person who can exploit an emergency, which is exempt from the constitutional order, which he does not want to use the law without saying anything. That is a danger to our country – and there is a danger in cities – “
The Sopian court agrees. The next case will come to the fore whether the court can invalidate the Trump tariff scheme or prevent the so -called president from dismissing a Federal Reserve member. So far, based on its behavior, the difficulties are that it will eliminate both the lower court decisions, which will give the executive branch even more power to do whatever it wants. For those who are hoping that the court will support its members – support and defend the Constitution – the difficulties are that this will not happen.
If you are sitting behind and wondering “What’s her relationship with me?” Here is the answer. Richardson referred to Jim Saksa Documentation of Democracy Those who explained in August can prevent a large number of soldiers from casting ballot, through threats, harassment and delays. The administration has also claimed fraud to occupy the voting machines, as Trump considered in 2020. In this week Mother Jones, Ari Burman noted that the administration has abolished efforts to promote electoral security and is working with the loyalists to stack the state elections board.
Mega loyal Steve Benn recently said: “They are entering MSNBC and CNN that, hey, since we are taking control of the cities, so we are going to become ice officers near polling sites. You are fine.” Illinois Governor JB Pratzkar, speaking of Trump’s threatening military attack in Chicago, observed: “This is not about fighting the crime. It is about the president and his complex Locky, Stephen Miller, who seek the foundations of finding the foundations for preventing our democracy.”
And it will end democracy in the United States.
Sign up for Clean Technica’s Weekly Subsic, Sign Up for Our Daily Newsletter, and Follow us on Google News!
Is a tip for a clean technicia? Want to advertise? Want to suggest a guest for our Clean Tech Talk Podcast? Contact us here.
Sign up for our Daily Newsletter for 15 new clean -tech stories a day. Or sign up for our weekly One on the top stories of the week if it happens many times a day.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hpcams8vwnc
Clean Technica uses adjacent links. See our policy here.
Clean Technica’s comment policy







