How many genes are too many? Breeding Crops to Cope with the Elements – Gene to Genome

How many genes are too many? Breeding Crops to Cope with the Elements – Gene to Genome

It may come as a surprise, but many plants in a typical salad actually have more genes than you. This does not make them more complex than humans, but it does show that they are designed to adapt.

Plants cannot move when conditions change. Instead, they rely on their genetic diversity to adapt to changes such as climate change, insect outbreaks, changing soils, and changing farming practices. But with these factors in constant flux, plant breeders face a nearly impossible task: optimizing crops for current conditions without limiting their ability to adapt to unexpected future conditions. As breeders work to improve plant performance, their goals are constantly evolving.

Part of the challenge lies in biology itself. Plants have evolved a wide range of genetic traits to survive in different environments. While these traits can be beneficial in certain situations, they do not work in isolation. Instead, they interact with each other and with the environment in complex ways. This is known as gene-environment interaction, where factors such as weather, soil conditions, and pests influence the way genes are expressed. Together, these interactions shape a plant’s traits, making it difficult to pinpoint which genes are actually driving success in any given environment.

A new follow-up study from Corteva Agriscience researchers explores this challenge, showing how the way we structure breeding programs affects not only how quickly crops improve, but how well they adapt to a changing world.

The study builds on earlier work by the same research team, which explored why traditional breeding programs, which are often decentralized and rely on a small number of elite plants, have been so successful. This work showed that narrowing the range of genetic possibilities can actually help breeders improve when dealing with complex genetics. The new study takes this idea a step further, asking what happens when these strategies are applied in a constantly changing environment.

To explore this question, the researchers turned to computer simulations. Instead of testing breeding strategies in real crops (which could take years or even decades), they created virtual breeding programs that allowed them to model how breeding populations evolved over time under different conditions. These simulations captured the complexity of plant genetics and the reality of changing environments. The researchers then compared different approaches to managing breeding programs to see how each approach affected both short-term progress and long-term adaptation. They focused on three main approaches: centralized programs, where all breeding takes place in one large population; Isolated programs, where small groups work independently. and distributed programs, where multiple groups work separately but share genetic material over time. The results revealed a clear tension: strategies that rapidly improve crops in the short term may also limit their ability to adapt to future changes.

Isolation breeding programs were initially able to develop rapidly. By narrowing their focus, they can more quickly identify and build on successful genetic combinations. But over time, these programs lost genetic diversity, limiting their ability to adapt to changing conditions.

At the other extreme, centralized programs maintained high levels of genetic diversity, giving them greater flexibility to respond to new challenges. But this broader approach often slowed progress in the short term.

The most effective strategy struck a balance between these two extremes. In distributed breeding programs, multiple groups worked independently while continuing to share genetic material. This structure allowed breeders to make constant improvements while preserving enough diversity to adapt to future conditions.

Together, these findings highlight a central challenge not only in plant breeding but also in genetics and evolution. Success in the present does not always prepare the organism for the future. In a world where environmental conditions are increasingly unpredictable, strategies that balance speed with resilience can be key to maintaining agricultural productivity and long-term resilience.

References

  • Technow F, Podlich D, Cooper M. Back to the future 2: implications of germline structure on the balance between short- and long-term genetic advantage in a target population of changing environments. G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics. April 2026. 16(4). https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkag044

  • Technow F, Podlich D, Cooper M. Back to the future: implications of genetic complexity for the structure of hybrid breeding programs.. G3: Genes|Genomes|Genetics. July 2021. 11(7). https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkab153

Share this article

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *