
Deep brain stimulation is already used for the treatment of Parkinson’s disease
Live Art Enterprises/Science Photo Library
A mental implant that detects it when someone suffers and responds with a deep mental stimulation has helped people get rid of unbearable chronic pain – a partner is also able to embrace his wife for the first time in the years.
Chronic pain affects 20 % of people in the United States, many of whom suffer from much relief from the treatment of traditional pain. The reason for this may be that this can result in fundamental changes in the brain circulation, which are the challenge of targeting and regenerating it with standard treatment.
Deep brain stimulation (DBS), which includes mobilizing the brain using a small electrode, has shown the promise but has yielded contradictory results. Traditionally, areas of the same brain are targeted at all one -sized approach, despite the evidence that different people cause pain from different circuits.
As a result, Prasad Sherwalkar at the University of California, San Francisco, and his colleagues wondered if a personal system would be more effective. To find out, the first six unhealthy chronic pain people passed through intracelline electrolysis, in which the electrode recorded and stimulated 14 sites activity in his brain over 10 days.
For five participants, researchers were able to identify which sites to target and which stimulus frequency provided the greatest relief. Although one of the five did not report the importance of getting rid of pain, he experienced improvement in physical functions and managed to embrace his wife for the first time in the years, which was considered quite meaningful to advance in the next phase of trial.
Researchers used machine learning to identify and distinguish between the next power activity, which happened when individuals had high or low level pain. He then installed a permanent DBS electrode in each partner, which was made of personal kind to monitor their mental activity and whenever pain -related activity was detected, and when they slept, they provided maximum stimulation to be inactive.
After six months of fine toning, each device was put into a test in a test in which participants found either their real, personal stimulus for three months, then have a shame for three months, or on the contrary, the participants are not told how they are receiving the stimulus. Syria encouraged the brain at little frequency in areas outside the ideal location, and pain reviews were collected several times a day during the entire trial.
On average, the real stimulus reduced the daily pain intensity by 50 %, while the pain increases by 11 %. During the shame, the daily step count increased by 18 % during the real stimulus compared to 1 %. Participants also reported less symptoms of depression and expressed low pain, which interfered with their daily life during real stimulus. These benefits remain in follow -up of 3.5 years.
“This is an important study that is taking advantage of the latest tools,” says Tim Dennis at Oxford University.
The previous problem for DBS technology has been a habit, in which the brain reduces constant stimulation and utility. Dennis says permanent benefits can be linked to participants when their pain level increases, rather than being permanent. He says the next phase will have to compare the adaptive vs permanent stimulus to measure differences in the results.
“Another challenge will be the economy and scaling of this technique,” says Dennis.
Titles:







