Fuel fuel or food: Which is bad for climate change?

For those who know, the title pair is ridiculous because it is well -established that focus fuel contributes to climate change than agriculture. However, the next day, someone insisted that food contribute more to climate change than fossil fuel. “Because we eat every day,” this person tried to explain to me. Although we humans need to eat regularly and it is every day unless a person is fasting or has no access to food, what we do as a person is less than industries. Agriculture is also helpful in climate change. Depending on what sources do you review, this part is about 20 % to 30 %.

If you guess this is a fossil Fuel Which produces a lot more than agriculture, you will be right. According to a new report, “only 100 companies since 1988 have been the source of more than 70 percent of the world’s greenhouse gas emissions.”

The following in an article on the UN website titled “Causes and Impacts of Climate Change” Have been described: “Goshim fuel – coal, oil and gas – is the largest assistant in global climate change, which is 75 % of greenhouse gas emissions and more than 90 % of all carbon dioxide emissions.”

The World Resources Institute published a defect of climate change emissions They wrote“The energy sector produces the highest emissions of greenhouse gas so far, which increases 75.7 percent worldwide.”

What did the US Environmental Protection Agency write about? Situation? “Burning the fossil fuel changes the climate more than any other human activity.”

And what US Energy Information Administration? “In the United States, most (about 74 74 %) human cause (anthropogenic) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions burns fueled fuel-coal, natural gas and petroleum-energy use.”

Harvard University has a goal of being free from felt fuel by 2050, and why Are they? “Burning of fossil fuel is the main driver of climate change. Gyoshmes use fuel and pollutes water – damages human health and damages non -proportionally weaker communities – which is why Harvard is a comprehensive approach to adding to the climate, equity and health.”

The contact of the yel climate Appeared An article The insurance industry about the backing of some foolish fuel companies. In it, the following was written: “However, insurance companies have become the biggest finance of foam fuel, which are The main reason for the climate change – Extracting and burning of oil, gas and coal is responsible for the emissions of more than 75 % greenhouse gases and about 90 % of carbon dioxide emissions.

UC Berkeley, especially for research, is one of the most trusted government universities in the United States. An article of it School of Public Health States: “This review highlights that carbon dioxide emissions are about 90 % of the emissions due to human fuel in fuel, heat the climate, accelerates the oceans, and gives the disasters of abnormal climate. Every year, millions of premature deaths and hundreds of thousands of fatalities are responsible.

Harvard and Yale are top universities in the United States. His counterparts in the UK can say that Oxford and Cambridge are. Appeared in an article Oxford open climate It has been stated: “We examine the vast scientific evidence that shows that the foam fuel and the foam fuel industry is the main cause of the climate crisis, damages the health, destroys environmental injustice, eliminates biological diversity, and causes the cause of the controversy. Are responsible for millions of pre -deaths, people, wildlife, and a living future.

An article about research conducted at Oxford University states that “the world is facing simultaneous inflation crisis, national security crisis and climate crisis, all of which is due to high cost, unsafe, pollution, pollution, volatile fuel prices. “

Intended to stop investment in Cambridge Foam fuel. “The University of Cambridge is already moving forward to the fuel distribution movement. The 811-year-old British agency announced Thursday that it not only plans to distribute its $ 4.5 billion break with fossil fuel-its aim is to get its investment-porch-porch-porch-porch.

By zooming a little, what the UK’s parliament says about the focus fuel and Climate change? “Currently 78 % of this energy is derived from small quantities of fuel-oil, gas and coal. The burning of these high carbon fuel in combustion engines, boilers and power stations is responsible for most of the regional emissions of the UK’s climate-changing greenhouse gases.”

And Canada? “Globally, about 80 80 % of GHG emissions from human sources are derived from burning foam fuel and industrial processes,” says a page on the Environmental Canadian website.

The world’s largest rain, Amazon, is in Brazil. What is the idea of the Brazilian government? A prominent figure in Brazil has in fact mentioned a project Get rid of foam fuel Fully “Brazilian Minister of Environment Marina Silva presented an idea on the table: a roadmap to eliminate the use of foam fuel, promise its headline Dubai Dell From 2023. “

Far from governments and educational institutions, pulling a little back, a respected person who was not environmentally worker, gave remarks about climate change. Late Pope Francis described the foam fuel Man guilty. Pope provided 3 key messages on it:

There is a dire need to substitute fossil fuel with sustainable energy and it should be available to everyone, including the poorest (para -26, 165 and 179).

The rich countries will have to help poor countries lead to the cleaning resources of energy through fossil fuel or lipfrig, technology transfer and technical support (Pars 52, 165 and 172).

Make energy efficiency as a key building block of maximum energy shift (Para 180).

Recently, I have been like a catalyst to get more ideas to write some of my exchanges with people. It is very clear that when agriculture and food play an important role in the climate change, foam fuels are still dominant.

Do not let anyone get confused about foam fuel, they are harmful to the planet And Human health, not only the environment. Harvard University will have the last word here: “Harvard University’s new research, in collaboration with Birmingham University, University of Leicester and University College London, found that more than 8 million people have been killed in 2018 with fossil fuel pollution, which is more likely to be more than a recent research.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vifwptxyles