Merrine archeology forward – the Bible Archeology Society

Merrine archeology forward – the Bible Archeology Society

To move the marine archeology

The sophisticated tech reveals new insights in ancient past

In the Israeli Gulf Haifa, a three camera photographer was used to document underwater archaeological documents. Aamir Yerman, Rums, the University of Heifa.

The sea and the sea are the last great borders near Eastern Archeology. Year by year, the Mediterranean Sea receives new data from the Sea of ​​the Sea to ancient ancient: ports and ports, maritime facilities, and ship debris that make global headlines, such as the 14th -century BCE Eloborone Shipworks and its valuable cargo in 1982.1 These discoveries require scholars to use a special set of tools and procedures that feature a special subfield -Maran archaeological.

Marine archeology (also known as the sea or underwater archeology) is relatively Young young. It was started in the second half of the 20th century by George Bass and Samal Pulk in Turkey, Peter Throukomorton in Greece, Frost in Lebanon and Cyprus, and Ovenser Robin and Elisha Linder in Israel.2 In its early years, these methods often include measuring tapes, carpets levels and palxaglus sheets to record underwater properties. Generally, the control points were selected around the excavation location and then the sample and features were developed on the Plexglass sheet with triangles and pencils. But the time has changed, and this field has developed a range of sophisticated, high -tech procedures connected in geo science and cyber -orchology that provides fresh insights about human environmental interactions, ancient trade networks and social changes.

Here, we highlight some of the ways based on a combined maritime archeology project between the University of Heifa and the University of California, San Diego, which aims to study how coastal societies have taken cultural and climate change over the past 10,000 years. The mutual cooperation project focuses on North Israel’s Carmel coast – mostly in the ancient town of Dor and around it, which is 13 miles south of Heifa – and the elements of three separate procedures, namely, marine geophysics, palewater environmental research, and underwater surveys and underwater surveys.


Free E Book: The future of cyber arcology in the sacred land. Modern archaeological methods help create a new and objective future of the past.


The first procedure is the element, marine geo -physics, refers to a non -invasive remote sensing technique that can examine the physical properties of the submerged scenes. The most useful methods include side scan Soner, Multi -Beum Eco Sounds, Marine Magnetic Meter, and Sub -profiles. This technique helps to find archaeological remnants and to assess the possibility of understanding their geological and environmental environment. Like the Sonar system, the subside profilers use the sound, but make a different class map under the sea floor. In the shallow waters (less than 32 feet depth), some devices can enter the sesame 65 feet deep. In the South Bay of Tele Door, we used a compact sub -batom profile to connect the earthquake surface surface of the earthquake surface of the buried land surface to us. This allowed us to rebuild the landscape around the telecommunication for more than ten thousand years, from kerosene to henstick and Roman periods.

South Bay’s aerial scenario, yellow lines on the telecommunication, showing the way to the bottom profile survey to identify the features of sinking archaeological features. Anthony Tambrino, CCAS, UC San Diego

The second element of our procedure is focused on obtaining a core of sesame covers in the coastal zone and in the sinking archeology. These contexts are important because marine organisms, dust and other sesame seeds are permanently collected on the sea floor. On the ground, the biology and sesame seeds accumulated by air or water are trapped in depression, such as leaks beds or archaeological places. The data of these sesame cores allow us to re -form the environment, temperature and land surfaces of the past. Different layers provide a timeline of collecting events that can be done with different laboratory techniques or through datable samples, such as stone tools and kerosene.

In fact, the surface analysis of the cores collected in the door South Bay has helped us identify a naithic tsunami. During the first excavation in the Gulf, we found the vessel sheds, a wall, and an arrow from the Potri Nethyak Period (the fifth -year -old BC). After that we pulled out two sesame cores on the beach that entered 30 feet below the surface so that the Calcurus Sandstone could reach the bedrock. In the history of the early pre -potter neolithic (9700-6750 BC), inside the swamp layers, we found a layer of saline water coast, mollusks and lime stone pebbles, which could only reach the tsunami wave from a remote environment. Given that the Nethak coast was 1 to 2 miles off the existing coast, the Sial Deposit had to travel on the wave at least 55 feet.

This powerful tsunami destroyed all the signs of the pre -verses before the vessel, which closed the region, eliminated the coastal fields, and forced the coast to go to the nearby valleys. It was only 500 years later that the pottery neolithic villages in the pottery (6750-4800 BC), as one of us found in the southern Gulf began to resettle the Carmal coast.


Now become a member of the BAS All access!

Read Bible archeology reviews Online, discover 50 years RepetitiveWatch videos, participate in conversations, and a lot

Approach


The third element of our methodology includes underwater digging and cyber arcology, which is later weddings with computer science, engineering, and natural sciences.3 Previous excavation shows that the indoor was a promoted helenstick and the Roman city (the fourth century BC – the fourth century CE), which had plenty of evidence for the Mediterranean exchange, but there were no remnants of the original facilities of the port. Our underwater surveys and excavation show that the DOR surface was destroyed by the rise in the sea during the Hellenstick period, but it restored its importance at the end of Roman.4

We discovered a Hallonstick Forty system, which protected the anchor in the southern Gulf and the Romanian structure in the northern Gulf. On the ground, our colleagues, Ilet Gulbah, S Rebecca Martin, and the late Allen Sharon, excavated the Helenstic-Parade Memorial architecture, well-planned streets, temples, imported kerosene, and other features of a rich maritime settlement, which is difficult to remove the Jewish historian.Jewish antiques 13.223).5 However, most interesting, our marine excavations eventually found the Roman Harbor late in the door, which is just 8 miles north of the major port city of Cisriya Maritima.

Today, the underwater and the archaeological remains are made easy and accurate using photographer -based technologies, where digital images are used to measure 3D models and areas or items. They provide valuable statistics to advance our understanding of ancient marine and coastal societies through novel methods.


Thomas E -Levy The University of California, San Diego, is a prominent professor of archaeological archeology of ancient Israel and neighboring lands. He specializes in ancient technology and social evolution.

Geld Schitanburg California is a geo -scientist at the University of San Diego. They have focused on coastal geometry and human environmental interactions in the eastern Mediterranean.

Asf Yasur Landau He is the archaeological professor of the Mediterranean at Heifa University and head of the Reconciliation Institute of Maritime Studies. It focuses on coastal archeology and underwater survey.


Note

1. Eric H. Klein, “Liturle truths,” Archeology OdisiNovember/December 1999.

2. To discuss some of these important tasks, Samal Plank, “Destruction of Ship!” See Archeology OdisiSeptember/October 1999; And Shelley Watchman, “Milestone: George F Boss (1932-2021),” RepetitiveFall 2021.

3. For more information about cyber arcology, Thomas Levit El. Cyber ​​arcology in sacred land: the future of the past (Washington, DC: Bible Archeology Society, 2013).

4. See Asf Yasur Lando, etc. International Journal of Marine Archeology 53.2 (2024), PP 515-534; And Gilad Schinburg Et El. Co -ranry Research 105 (2021), page 1-18.

5. Close to the Eastern Archeology 74.3 (2011), page 132-154.


In the relevant reading Bible History daily

Picked up from Finnish Ship C -Floor

Growing sea, lucky changing

The Roman ship’s debris was found off the coast of Israel

A memorable structure underwater in the gallonal sea

Divers discovered the goods drowned in Herod 22 Port City

Found to be drowned nibatin temple

Not A Was Yet the library or an all -access member? Join today.

Share this article

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *